One of the issues underlying current debates between practitioners of art history visual culture and aesthetics is whether the visual is a unique irreducible category or whether it can be assimilated with the textual or verbal without any significant loss. Can paintings buildings or installations be 'read' in the way texts are read or deciphered or do works of visual art ask for their own kind of appreciation? This is not only a question of choosing the right method in dealing with visual works of art but also an issue that touches on the roots of the disciplines involved: can a case be made for the visual as an irreducible category of art and if so how is it best studied and appreciated? In this anthology this question is approached from the angles of three disciplines: aesthetics visual culture and art history. Unlike many existing overviews of visual culture studies it includes both painting and architecture and investigates historical ways of defining and appreciating the visual in their own contemporary terms. Dealing with the Visual will be of great use to advanced students because it offers an overview of current debates and to graduate students and professionals in the field because the essays offer in-depth investigations of the methodological issues involved and various historical ways of defining visuality. The topics included range from early modern ways of viewing pictures and sixteenth-century views of Palladio's villas in their landscape settings to contemporary debate about whether there is life yet in painting. |Dealing with the Visual Art History Aesthetics and Visual Culture | Visual Studies