Voluntariness is a necessary condition of valid consent. But determining whether a person consented voluntarily can be difficult especially when people are subjected to coercion or manipulation placed in a situation with no acceptable alternative other than to consent to something or find themselves in an abusive relationship. This book presents a novel view on the voluntariness of consent especially medical consent which the author calls Interpersonal Consenter-Consentee Justification (ICCJ). According to this view consent is voluntary if and only if the process by which it has been obtained aligns with specific principles of interpersonal justification. ICCJ is distinctive because it explains voluntary consent neither as a ‘psychological’ concept indicative of the inner states of a person’s mind (e. g. willingness or reluctance) nor as a ‘circumstantial’ concept indicative of a person’s set of options. Rather ICCJ explains the voluntariness of consent as an ‘interpersonal’ concept focusing on the interaction between the person giving consent and the person receiving it and requiring the absence of illegitimate control by the consent-receiver. In so doing ICCJ further develops the notion of interpersonal justification known from contractualist theories in moral philosophy and introduces it to the debate on consent. The author employs a top-down approach defending ICCJ’s key characteristics on the basis of general theoretical arguments as well as a bottom-up approach supporting ICCJ in its application to clinical challenges such as nudging and manipulation living organ donation and clinical trials. Voluntary Consent will appeal to researchers and advanced students in normative ethics bioethics philosophy of law behavioural psychology and medicine. | Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice
Price now:
Price History:
Details:Voluntariness is a necessary condition of valid consent. But determining whether a person consented voluntarily can be difficult especially when people are subjected to coercion or manipulation placed in a situation with no acceptable alternative other than to consent to something or find themselves in an abusive relationship. This book presents a novel view on the voluntariness of consent especially medical consent which the author calls Interpersonal Consenter-Consentee Justification (ICCJ). According to this view consent is voluntary if and only if the process by which it has been obtained aligns with specific principles of interpersonal justification. ICCJ is distinctive because it explains voluntary consent neither as a ‘psychological’ concept indicative of the inner states of a person’s mind (e. g. willingness or reluctance) nor as a ‘circumstantial’ concept indicative of a person’s set of options. Rather ICCJ explains the voluntariness of consent as an ‘interpersonal’ concept focusing on the interaction between the person giving consent and the person receiving it and requiring the absence of illegitimate control by the consent-receiver. In so doing ICCJ further develops the notion of interpersonal justification known from contractualist theories in moral philosophy and introduces it to the debate on consent. The author employs a top-down approach defending ICCJ’s key characteristics on the basis of general theoretical arguments as well as a bottom-up approach supporting ICCJ in its application to clinical challenges such as nudging and manipulation living organ donation and clinical trials. Voluntary Consent will appeal to researchers and advanced students in normative ethics bioethics philosophy of law behavioural psychology and medicine. | Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice
Price now:
Routledge
25.00% (+ £25.00)
New
£125.00
Voluntariness is a necessary condition of valid consent. But determining whether a person consented voluntarily can be difficult especially when people are subjected to coercion or manipulation placed in a situation with no acceptable alternative other than to consent to something or find themselves in an abusive relationship. This book presents a novel view on the voluntariness of consent especially medical consent which the author calls Interpersonal Consenter-Consentee Justification (ICCJ). According to this view consent is voluntary if and only if the process by which it has been obtained aligns with specific principles of interpersonal justification. ICCJ is distinctive because it explains voluntary consent neither as a ‘psychological’ concept indicative of the inner states of a person’s mind (e. g. willingness or reluctance) nor as a ‘circumstantial’ concept indicative of a person’s set of options. Rather ICCJ explains the voluntariness of consent as an ‘interpersonal’ concept focusing on the interaction between the person giving consent and the person receiving it and requiring the absence of illegitimate control by the consent-receiver. In so doing ICCJ further develops the notion of interpersonal justification known from contractualist theories in moral philosophy and introduces it to the debate on consent. The author employs a top-down approach defending ICCJ’s key characteristics on the basis of general theoretical arguments as well as a bottom-up approach supporting ICCJ in its application to clinical challenges such as nudging and manipulation living organ donation and clinical trials. Voluntary Consent will appeal to researchers and advanced students in normative ethics bioethics philosophy of law behavioural psychology and medicine. | Voluntary Consent Theory and Practice
General | |
---|---|
Brand | Routledge |
Sellers offer a range of delivery options, so you can choose the one that’s most convenient for you. Many sellers offer free delivery. You can always find the postage cost and estimated delivery date in a seller’s listing. You'll then be able to see a full list of delivery options during checkout. These can include: Express delivery, Standard delivery, Economy delivery, Click & Collect, Free local collection from seller.
Your options for returning an item vary depending on what you want to return, why you want to return it, and the seller's return policy. If the item is damaged or doesn't match the listing description, you can return it even if the seller's returns policy says they don't accept returns. If you've changed your mind and no longer want an item, you can still request a return, but the seller doesn't have to accept it. If the buyer changes their mind about a purchase and wants to return an item, they may need to pay return postage costs, depending on the seller's return policy. Sellers can provide a return postage address and additional return postage information for the buyer. Sellers pay for return postage if there's a problem with the item. For example, if the item doesn't match the listing description, is damaged or defective or is counterfeit. By law, customers in the European Union also have the right to cancel the purchase of an item within 14 days beginning from the day you receive, or a third party indicated by you (other than the carrier) receives, the last good ordered by you (if delivered separately). This applies to all products except for digital items (e.g. Digital Music) that are provided immediately to you with your acknowledgement, and other items such as video, DVD, audio, video games, Sex and Sensuality products and software products where the item has been unsealed.
Sellers have to offer a refund for certain items only if they are faulty, such as: Personalised items and custom-made items, Perishable items, Newspapers and magazines, Unwrapped CDs DVDs and computer software. If you used your PayPal balance or bank account to fund the original payment, the refunded money will go back to your PayPal account balance. If you used a credit or debit card to fund the original payment, the refunded money will go back to your card. The seller will effect the refund within three working days but it may take up to 30 days for Paypal to process the transfer. For payments funded partially by a card and partially by your balance/bank, the money taken from your card will go back to your card and the remainder will return to your PayPal balance.